Best Home Interior Designer in Bhubaneswar: Throughout the country, countless villages are engaged in war. The unstoppable force of progress includes both eager buyers and new home builders. Residents who have already built their homes in developing areas and are located on the anti-real estate side of the local authority. Contestants are fighting for the right to define the look of neighborhoods, including how to limit "cookie-cutter" homes and ensure a variety of architectural styles.
When families move to a new neighborhood, they are often surprised to find that an almost exact replica of the house they already call home is being built just two doors away. How did this happen? Ultimately, during a meeting with their builder, they selected the color of the roof shingles, bricks, and siding; they even went against the original design and chose the more expensive landscape package. However, suddenly, the comparable dreams that are emerging on their street undermine their sense of pride, ownership of the home and their biggest investment.
On the other hand, home developers and builders face tremendous financial and competitive pressures. When property developers buy and "reserve" land for future use, development begins years before construction begins. Developers hope that customers will still want the land they bought ten years ago because it is a speculative game. The secret is to attract a wide range of people and buy land in locations that will appreciate in value over time. Homes that are offered for sale or planned for construction in such neighborhoods reflect this broad appeal. The safest course is always one of the limited numbers of easily adjustable designs that are reasonably priced and meet the needs of most individuals.
When a buyer sits down to "customize" one of these plans, he or she often selects from a predefined list of options that are intended to complement each other and result in an attractive home. This is a reasonable system – until you take into account the possibility that, in a certain community, where home buyers are similar in terms of age, wealth, education, values, etc. – so too will their preferences for home design. are similar. Before you know it, two different buyers have selected comparable materials and colors after starting with the same basic idea. Oh, what should I do now?
Naturally, everyone has the right to choose the design of their home. Some of America's greatest mansions have distinctive and unique designs that perfectly reflect the personalities of their owners. But "typical" suburban areas are rarely the sites of these types of dwellings. They generally sit on properties that have no notable architectural setting and are concerned only with the landscape and trees.
Most of the houses in this country are built adjacent to each other. A community is made up of many homes, and a neighborhood with similar architectural features looks better and holds its value better. But this is also the issue of conflict. Too many identical homes can give an area an uninteresting feel. Beautiful residences lose some of their charm. When homeowners and city officials begin to oppose the repurposing of similar homes, builders and developers may soon have to defend their right to build as their buyers demand.
Although this is a challenging and complex problem, there are answers. The most popular is to establish a design review process, which is a way to ensure whether a specific design is a good fit for the surrounding homes. Even though design reviews are fundamentally subjective, they can be highly objective if precise rules are established. For many years, historic communities across the country have effectively maintained their character and property values through the use of design review. Design criteria are used by recent communities to ensure architectural diversity and design compatibility at the same time. According to the design review process, each home design should be treated as a unique project, not simply a repetition of a standard blueprint. Additionally, each suggested design must be evaluated in the context of surrounding habitats.
However, the design review process can be difficult and painful due to the inherent difficulty of applying rules to something as subjective and personal as home design.
A better answer is to add more "custom" to the custom design process. A "true" custom home is one that is built with the specific owner's wishes, goals, aspirations, and desires in mind from the start. A house has a distinct personality that can be transferred to another when it represents the quirks of the family living there. By definition it is unique from everything else. When more true custom homes are built in neighborhoods with "cookie-cutter" issues, desired diversity is added, increasing the overall architectural integrity of the community.
Participating in the custom design process offers many benefits to the homeowner. An obvious example is a house that is more suitable for a specific family than a speculative property built for a mass market. Which could mean that living there brings more happiness and satisfaction. The implication may be that the rooms were intended to be used, unlike many modern residences where older ceremonial spaces are used only as places to display furniture.
However, the biggest benefit may be monetary. Custom-designed homes are often smaller, and smaller homes offer you the option to save money on finer details throughout the project or pay less for the entire build (after all, it's the details that really set beautiful homes apart). We do). Additionally, a custom-designed home can use materials more effectively, saving money on the building's foundation. Cutting costs in-house can also cover the additional expenses of hiring designers.
Recently, a builder client of mine contacted me to ask about possible solutions for a potential buyer who is "struggling" to build in an area where building codes promote the use of expensive exterior materials. Are. The buyer wants to save as much of the home as possible, so even if he has a tight budget, he may have to compromise on the exterior design. If he did this the Design Review Board would undoubtedly be angry with him. His buyer may not know it, but he's about to join the ranks of people fighting for the right to decide what our neighborhoods look like.
Comentários